Skip to main content Skip to footer

ESG Expert Series: More than 70% of Green Mark office buildings in Singapore to see a fall in ratings

green mark buildings, esg, colliers blog

The BCA has significantly tightened the energy-efficiency requirements for its Green Mark certification scheme on November 1, 2021. Following this revision, almost 73% of the currently certified office buildings in Singapore could, literally, be off the mark. Find out how the scheme has changed and how your office building can still retain that green tick, in this first article of our new ESG Expert Series.


Did you know that the built environment is responsible for 39% of carbon emissions globally? These emissions are a result of both the embodied carbon of the building materials (primarily steel and concrete) as well as the emissions associated with operating them.

That is why addressing the design, construction, and operation of buildings is one of the many essential strategies for the world to achieve net zero emissions collectively.

blog REMS esg green building

In Singapore, the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has been encouraging the construction of energy-efficient and high-performance buildings through its Green Mark certification scheme since January 2005. However, to help Singapore further raise its built environment’s sustainability standards tailored for the tropical climate, the BCA has announced the new BCA Green Mark 2021 scheme (GM: 2021) on November 1, 2021.

Under the updated scheme, there are several significant improvements that promise to enhance the built environment and drive decarbonisation. These include aggressive energy-efficiency standards, the drive to align with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, as well as performance-based recertification, among others.

Among these improvements, the revised energy-efficiency standards and recertification process will potentially catalyse significant reduction in energy consumption and carbon emissions from buildings.

Energy efficiency is now the sole determinant of your building’s rating
In the previous Green Mark certification scheme, the ratings were based on the number of points accumulated from fulfilling various assessment criteria, including energy- and non-energy-related components. In addition, there were also prerequisites for chiller efficiency for each certification level. As a result, a higher rating may not always correlate to a more energy-efficient building, as some points may have been scored for non-energy-related items.
 

"Under GM: 2021, almost two out of three office buildings do not qualify for a rating."


Furthermore, a building could recertify under the same certification level through a simplified process, which did not require the applicants to fulfil specific targets for energy use, provided that there was no major retrofit.

GM: 2021 seeks to address these issues. Under the new standard, the certification level is solely based on energy efficiency. This helps to ensure that the higher-rated buildings operate more efficiently. In addition, five sustainability sections have been created to address the non-energy components and building projects may pursue recognition in any or all of these sections. Buildings that fulfil the requirements will be awarded badges to recognise their exceptional performance in the respective areas of sustainability.

blog REMS esg green building 2

 

Recertification now depends on the active management of your building’s energy use

Equally significant is the change to the criteria for recertification – now known as In-Operation.

GM: 2021 In Operation requires buildings to submit energy consumption data for the last three years. The certification level is based on the building’s Energy Usage Intensity (EUI), which is the annual energy consumption of a building, divided by the gross floor area. The threshold for each certification level has been tightened and buildings are now required to actively manage energy usage to retain their Green Mark rating.

Almost two out of three office buildings don’t qualify for a rating under GM: 2021
To assess the impact of this change, we examined the performance of more than 100 large office buildings in Singapore, based on the data collected from the BCA’s Building Energy Submission System.

This study focused on the 2019 reported energy use of commercial office buildings that have a gross floor area of more than 15,000 square meters and had attained a Green Mark rating. Our analysis was conducted based on the electric usage data from 2019, which is a more reasonable and accurate reflection of how office buildings would have typically operated prior to the COVID-19 restrictions.

As shown in Figure 1 below, among the large office buildings certified under the earlier Green Mark certification scheme, more than 60% had achieved a Platinum rating, which is the highest level of certification.
 

Figure 1: Breakdown of Green Mark ratings for large office buildings in Singapore

 

However, when the new standards under GM: 2021 were applied to the same office buildings upon recertification, the percentage of office buildings with a Platinum rating significantly shrunk by 68%, while those with a Gold Plus or Gold rating also saw a marked decrease. In fact, almost two out of every three office buildings would not even qualify for a rating, as shown in Figure 2 below.

It is worth noting that under the new certification framework, the BCA has also introduced a new rating, known as the Super Low Energy (SLE) rating, which is currently the highest rating, above the Platinum level.

Breakdown of green mark ratings using Green Mark 2021 criteria

Figure 2: Breakdown of Green Mark Rating using Green Mark: 2021 criteria


In actual numbers, shown in Figure 3 below, 36 of the 69 office buildings that are currently certified Platinum would not even receive a rating under new GM: 2021 framework – this means that more than half of the office buildings currently with a Platinum rating would be unrated under the new scheme.

Five of the office buildings would see a downgrade to a Gold rating; and six of them would slip to a Gold Plus rating. Only 10 office buildings would retain their current Platinum rating, while 12 would see an upgrade to an SLE rating.

Overall, 73% of the large office buildings in Singapore could see their ratings fall; 11% would retain their current ratings; whereas 16% would witness an improvement in their ratings.

Potential green mark rating changes

Figure 3: Potential Green Mark Rating changes for office buildings

 
What are the implications for building owners and operators?

For sure, the new scheme will pose a considerable challenge to the owners and operators of all buildings, not just office buildings, and it will have significant material consequences for the entire real estate industry in Singapore.

In the current environment, where office tenants are increasingly looking for energy-efficient and green office spaces, many organisations have developed sustainability guidelines that specify the minimum green rating standards for the spaces they lease. A shake-up in the Green Mark ratings of buildings with these new standards is likely to drive tenants to relocate to buildings that are more aligned with their sustainability objectives.

Hence, building owners should start to act now by assessing their building’s EUI and identifying the areas that need to be more energy-efficient, such as the cooling system, lighting or tenant-controlled spaces. By doing so, they can improve their operations, secure their Green Mark rating, reduce expenses, improve tenant satisfaction, and future-proof their buildings.

For a comprehensive assessment of your building and to develop a sustainability strategy to improve its performance to retain or enhance your Green Mark rating, talk to a Real Estate Management Services expert at Colliers in Singapore today.

 

You may also like:

 

Liked what you read? Subscribe to our mailing list for more thought-pieces on the latest in commercial real estate.

---

Article enquiries

Contact our Colliers Editorial team here.


Related Experts

David Berger

Sustainability Manager

Advisory & Consulting

Singapore

David is a Sustainability Manager for the Real Estate Management Services (REMS) team in Singapore where he is focused on implementing ESG initiatives across the built environment. 

David has over a decade of experience improving building performance through innovative energy efficiency and sustainability solutions. He believes that buildings should be efficient, healthy, comfortable, and accessible for all stakeholders. David has expertise in conducting energy audits across building typologies, performing building-related research, working with certification programs, assessing technical solutions, and creating sustainability plans.

While ESG issues may seem intimidating, David believes they represent key opportunities to improving the operations, performance, and health of buildings and organisations.

View expert

Stephen Bruce

Executive Director & Head

Real Estate Management Services

Singapore

As Head of REMS Singapore my role is to develop and drive the REMS business and team for wider success. My passion in real estate started young with a focus on asset management and later into consultancy. I have over 17 years of experience working for an on behalf of landlords throughout the Asia region. I have worked closely across portfolio landlords and single-strata landlords alike. A core focus has been how to improve the productivity, efficiency and service delivery for assets to ensure we can acheive the best possible outcome.

I have worked across several disciplines across real estate - a focus has been on asset management and property management for and behalf of Landlords. A great passion is how we can alter the industry towards adoption of ESG policies, methods and deliverables in tandem with management operations. With new technology now a major focus in real estate, the industry has become more exciting than ever before.”

I am a passionate believer of real collaboration and encourage cross department learning as much as possible. A win for one team should always create a strong and positive opportunity for another.

As a father of 2 young girls I am constantly on the look-out for new and exciting adventures to expose them to. A keen tennis and hockey player, I can often be found hitting a ball somewhere.

View expert